his distaste for women because he believes that women's duty is no more than a wife and a mother

his distaste for women because he believes that women

but its always women the first ones to jump up to say how 'unrealistic' it is to live off one income to save males from the one fucking responsibility they have left in society. You will NEVER hear males say its unrealistic to expect a woman to carry children for 9 months, birth them, nurse and take care of them, all while holding down a professional career and paying half the bills. What is it with split the bills chicks and their anger towards women with standards that do not match their own? Y'all gotta stop approaching things with this viewpoint because it's not accurate. All of his income has been translated to pure savings and investments.įinancially comfortable people do not come from nothing, and part of how they get set up to be financially comfortable is because their parents support them for half of their lives and after their deaths. My bf is an only child and will inherit around 1m in assets/real estate when his parents die.

A friend of mine's grandpa died this spring and even only on the portion of the inheritance he got through his mother (which is to say there will be even more after she dies too), he was able to put 100k down on the home and plot of land he purchased, and there was also enough to create full college funds for his two young children. Men who make that much likely come from financially well off families and have financial support when it comes to home ownership and lifestyle expenses, as well as an inheritance coming.

Why do y'all always assume people making 6 figures have no other stream of income than their salary itself and then base the COL expenses only on that? That's not how it works. His net worth would be a lot higher than just his annual salary. I’m speaking from a very traditional perspective though.Ī man who makes that much would have even more in savings and investments. My income should be a bonus for savings, investments, etc. Whatever the amount is required financially, he’s got it or will find a way. They even say this incessantly on social media, forums and IRL. meanwhile men of means will marry the assistant or waitress because fact is that for most men, income is not a factor in their courtship of a woman. To each their own, but what I have noticed is while men still make more on the dollar than women, it seems like women are always the ones making excuses for why a two income household is critical. There are many couples who still share this traditional belief and manage to make it work despite the higher COL, though I understand that most people don’t operate that way in this day and age. It doesn’t mean that won’t come without potential sacrifice or flexibility but that’s where my value system lies. Suppose I want to be a SAHM/W, we should be able to do that with him still providing financially for the home. Your points are valid, but personally I still operate off the belief that a man should provide independent of my income.

His distaste for women because he believes that women's duty is no more than a wife and a mother